|
The Fertility Question
Enough about my sex life, already
By Nancy Rabinowitz
"Are they natural?" asked a stranger at a fundraising
dinner, after learning that I am pregnant with twins.
"No, they're synthetic," I answered.
Well, no, I didn't. But I wanted to. I'm tired of the almost daily queries
into my fertility status. It seems that when people hear the word "twins,"
they lose all sense of propriety. Perhaps because of the extensive media
attention given to assisted reproductive technologies, total strangers
become oddly obsessed with finding out how it happened that my husband
and I are expecting two babies, instead of the more socially acceptable
one. No one would ever ask an expectant mother of a singleton, "How many
times did you have sex before you got pregnant?" But these same people
unabashedly delve into my procreative process.
Some people are blatant. "Oh, did you
take fertility drugs?" they ask with the same nonchalance they would use
to inquire about my recipe for peach jam. Some are subtly offensive, like
a woman I met sitting in a restaurant. "I'm a twin!" she exclaimed with
a smile. "But that was nearly forty years ago when twins were natural."
(As opposed to my demon spawn.) And some respond to the news of our twins
in a manner so rude it's astonishing: "Did you say twins? Oh my God! Bet
you're sorry about those fertility drugs now!"
What none of these people seems to realize—or
at least to acknowledge—is that to ask or make assumptions about fertility
is about as personal as it gets. These procreation nosy-bodies are, in
effect, asking about my sex life: Do I have some fatal flaw as a woman?
Or, (and I can almost see the gleeful horror in their eyes) is my husband
somehow … incapable? Did we do it alone? Did we "do it" at all?
I dream of appropriate comebacks, always
after the fact: "Why, are you infertile?" or "How's your sex life?" But
the real question I want to ask is: Why do you care? Do you think that
children born from fertility treatments are less real, less of an accomplishment,
less worthy by virtue of medical intervention? Maybe people ask because
they want to feel superior. After all, they didn't need any help. Perhaps
they think that we will love our babies less if they are born of medical
science. That somehow, they are not really ours. What must they think of
adoptive parents? I can only imagine the questions they must get.
Of course, the appropriate comeback
is "None of your business." But that would be rude. Never mind how rude
the question that elicited that response in the first place. But the truth
is, I do mind. I mind it more, even, than the people who, in response to
learning about our pregnancy, feel mysteriously compelled to tell us horror
stories about their friends. "You're pregnant? Fabulous! You know, a friend
of mine lost her pregnancy in her seventh month!" Or my personal favorite,
from a lawyer friend, "I just handled a case where a woman died in childbirth.
Boy, did that hospital have to pay up!"
Great. I'll be sure to call you if this
pregnancy happens to kill me and I'm short on cash.
At least the horror-story people are
simply revealing a flaw in their own sensitivity, a propensity for gloom,
or a distinct lack of self-editing skills. People who ask about fertility
drugs, however, are not revealing something about themselves; they're seeking
to uncover some perceived failing in me.
Not that infertility is a failing. It
is a diagnosable medical condition, no more shameful than diabetes or male
pattern baldness. And fertility treatments are an example of medical science
at its best. They help millions of couples every year create families.
They bring new life into this world. What could possibly be shameful in
that?
Yet I decline to answer the question
again and again. When people ask "Did you take fertility drugs?" I simply
answer, "There are a lot of twins in my family." Which is true but is also,
of course, not an answer at all. Why should I answer? To say no would be
somehow degrading to those who did use treatments. To say yes would inevitably
lead to even more personal questions; "what's wrong with you?" comes to
mind. The bottom line is, however they got there, these are our babies—not
an excuse for some stranger to pry into the most intimate details of our
private life.
Not that everyone is rude or invasive.
Every once in a while when I tell someone I'm expecting twins, they simply
smile and say congratulations. Maybe these people are also wondering whether
or not my husband and I used assisted reproductive technologies, but they
have enough good breeding not to ask. Or maybe they realize, as we did,
finding out we were pregnant after months of emotionally, financially,
and physically demanding fertility treatments, that medically aided or
not, every pregnancy is a miracle, and every child worthy of celebration.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Nancy Rabinowitz is a freelance television writer and producer specializing
in launching new shows and networks. She recently launched into motherhood
and lives in New York City with her husband and twin boy and girl. This
is her first published piece.
"When I wrote this essay, I was still pregnant. I assumed once the
pregnancy was over, the questions would be, too. Wrong. Now, people don’t
ask me how I "got" my babies, they just ask about them. Do they sleep?
Do I sleep? Do I want more? (No, no, who knows.) Several people have asked
whether my boy/girl twins are identical. "Yes," I want to answer, "except
that one has a penis and the other …" The questions are still personal,
but I don’t mind. It’s partly sleep deprivation—all other annoyances pale
in comparison. But mostly, it’s now that my children are here, I could
talk about them endlessly—with absolutely anyone who will listen."
|
|